🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an celebration that began as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a corporate feel, growing to encompass gatherings where Black people are compensated to speak with Caucasian groups about hidden biases and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The wave has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Month

Originally observed in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in October in the UK, Deutschland, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The observance has evolved since those days, giving reduced attention to the histories of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and more on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the celebration is observed is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it evolves is a valuable example in how co-option leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Little demonstrates how critical it is to rethink Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the summer we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a legislator feels emboldened to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, far-right parties are surging in the EU as a complete entity.

In the America, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the state. A campaign to remove African American heritage and experience from the historical documents is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the celebration represents how minimally it can be influential if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered festivities of historical achievements, rather than confronting the conditions of the current era. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is required. An academic expert, a prof at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand efforts for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month altogether, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an era that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an foundation that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a era that does not evade political issues, and leaves space for individuals, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has mere awareness of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Establishments who mark it should not be pacified with the passive language of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to minor insults, but challenged by the threats that impact society if anti-racism is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and reactive. Maybe an complete renaming is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.