🔗 Share this article

Iturns out the manager could survive losing against lower-league opposition. Survive a decisive European final against one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood losing at home against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, undermining the team's most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to engage. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. Even the most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who frequently berated at his players for losing individual battles crumbling in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of one of England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this entire bruising episode appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, based on his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to regard Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary within the club's structure: a man who owed his position as much to his friendship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. By masterfully outsmarting United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth earlier, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among football's strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which the club's mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

The Tactical Conflict Over System and Philosophy

For example, it was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas faced pushback. However, such directives hold greater authority when delivered by a man of a man the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of three England caps and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, without any penalty clause in place. The director seldom speaks publicly, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – function at a level exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being ready to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Power In Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his desire for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to adopt data science and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he announced that United’s style to football “shall be decided by this group”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his background in industry and yachting. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Whom else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that looks a lot like an abstract design, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

A New Football Order: Executives Above Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to go into an organization and see their vision through to completion. But how many companies have such individuals set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the strategy in the boardroom and appoint a coach who can tailor their methods accordingly. If coaches were once chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the product, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered cold or fails of the box.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the receptionist of the operation, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined while those individuals who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Football: Accountability for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance in action: the elevation of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose errors can invariably be sacked away without justification. Appoint the system coach and then fire them for playing too much that system. Hire the project manager and then discard them for taking too long. And above all be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.