🔗 Share this article Russia Seeks Staggering Sum in Damages from Euroclear over Frozen Funds The Russian central bank has stated it is claiming compensation amounting to $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step represents a clear response by the Kremlin regarding plans to utilize frozen Russian sovereign funds to support Ukraine. The Legal Claim Based on accounts in Russian news outlets, the monetary authority filed a lawsuit last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim. EU leaders are set to decide in the coming days regarding a plan to use around €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. This scheme entails providing Ukraine with a large loan to finance its military and economic stability. The vast majority of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the main custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised sovereign wealth. Dispute on Ownership European Union officials have argued that their plan is legally sound. They argue rests on the principle that title of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in EU countries following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Moscow, however, has labeled any use of the assets as theft. It has warned of retaliatory measures, such as confiscating EU private investors' holdings within Russia. The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a key position in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal. Wider Implications In comments interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the assets plan as "a severe assault on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States." The clearing house refused to provide a statement on the latest legal action. It has in the past noted it is contending with over 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions. Enforcement Challenges While courts in EU countries are unlikely to enforce judgments from Russian tribunals, experts expect Moscow to seek implementation in countries with stronger relations to the Kremlin. "Russian monetary authorities could try to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that relevant assets can be located," stated a lawyer from an NSP law firm. EU Countermeasures European authorities said they are developing steps to discourage other nations from assisting any Russian legal action against European entities. They are also designing protections to protect EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation." How the Funding Would Work Under the complex scheme, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would remain unaffected. Ukraine would solely be obligated to repay the loan in the event that Russia agreed to pay compensation for the vast damage caused during the ongoing war. Other Funding Ideas The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an alternative method for financing Ukraine. This entails joint EU debt issuance to fund a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the European budget. This alternative move, nevertheless, demands full agreement among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has already expressed its opposition. Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, said the reparations loan as "the most credible option" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is equally significant," she stated. "It also sends a clear message that when you cause all this damage to another country, you have to pay for the reparations."