🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision over how to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.